
Have you noticed that it's less cool to be "green" this year with your Christmas shopping? Apparently having elected a "green" president is enough for our national psyche.
Those of you who know me know that I don't believe in global warming (you can think I'm koo-koo nutty if you want to) but you also know that we sort of actually do a lot of "green" things accidentally. We limit our driving, hang laundry, reuse containers, use cloth diapers, etc. I don't do these things because I think they'll stave off global warming, I do them because I'm cheap. Really, really cheap. And I don't like the "green" solutions that actually cost more in resources, time, and money than regular options. Like a entryway mat made of recycled waterbottles. Only in these enlightened times is buying new crap the way to justify having bought stupid old crap.
Anyway, this comes up as an intro for a quote I read today from Greg Gutfeld, who comments in the opinion section on Fox News (you may think I'm koo-koo nutty for reading them if you like). I don't agree with everything Gutfeld writes by a loooooong shot, and he has an abrasive, sarcastic style, but I thought this quote captured one reason why I'm so turned off by global warming, particularly this time of year:
"Faced with imminent destruction of the planet due to global warming, farmers are now forced to turn crops into fuel. Ethanol, that is. This has forced farmers to raise their prices, which they don’t mind - and reduce supplies of food. And here’s the heart of global warming theology - and it is a theology: a
fundamental self-loathing for the human race, knitted into an overpowering sense of self-importance. The selfish, all-consuming human is what’s wrong with the world — and hooray for me! — the sensitive, intelligent Prius driver, for pointing it out. Which means –with a reduction in food and rising prices — we’re approaching what the Gores of the world really want — the sacrifice of humanity for a false god: global warming."
For the record, all of the real people I know who are worried about global warming are not Prius drivers nor are they know-it-all jerks. And I don't think Al Gore really wants to sacrifice the whole race, although I've never met him; personally I think he's just into making money out of the global warming thing. But many of the professional doomsayers about global warming do have a very distorted view of humanity, to the point of advocating almost any strategy to ensure that there will be less of us in the future. I agree that humans haven't done their job on this planet, but fixing the sin of greed with the sin of murder -- even indirect murder-- makes very little sense.
So, at Christmas, when we are being reminded of the Incarnation and the fact that God hid Himself in human flesh, a "Green" Christmas that ends in thinking about how much better it would be to get rid of a few billion people is inappropriate.
However, a Christmas that endeavors to not spend beyond our means and, with a small celebration, to focus on the Incarnation, is immensely appropriate. As C.S. Lewis pointed out, Christmas is properly either a pagan holiday (solstice) or a Christian feast. What it has never been until recent years is a commercial exercise; it's foolish to do buying in December that you would never do in February. And if you seek, as I am, to spend rationally this year, you will find that you, like me, are accidentally "green." You'll end up giving things like food or homemade sweaters. (No one's getting a sweater, sorry.) Or you'll choose one well-made item instead of ten flimsy plastic items from China. You certainly won't get someone a mat made of recycled water bottles.
So I can wish you a Green Christmas after all-- just the right kind of green.
Don't worry, no more philosophy tomorrow-- just babies. Until then,
Ciao bella,
Breanna