I write stuff, I read stuff, I manage my kid's diabetes and my kids' education, and I pray a lot.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Now I Have Book Envy
No baby pictures today, mostly because I have to charge the camera battery, but I assure you they're both doing great. Brother is getting fatter by the hour, thank the Lord, and Miss Boo has red "pant" on her toenails today and feels Gorgeous because of it. The Lead Mitigation Lady from the county came by to check our walls and windowsills today and Miss Boo took that moment to make the couch Gorgeous too, albeit with a (thanks again, Lord) washable yellow crayon instead of nail polish. Of course, I couldn't become Mama the Wrathful because the Lead Mitigation Lady was here. Miss Boo is no fool.
We are enjoying a few tiny thunderstorms before it's time for me to go out and harvest the army of green beans invading the northeast corner of my garden.
With that short update, I think I'll get back to my squad of GIs who have been patiently waiting for me since last night (in a short story). I left them standing in the Black Forest, and now I have to figure out how they're going to get out again.
Cheers,
Breanna
Sunday, August 30, 2009
We've Been Having This Sort of Weekend...
...And Brother has been exercising, exercising, exercising, and then, for a change, kicking Mama with both feet.
I have some exciting news, for those of you who know that I write fiction. I've had a short story accepted for publication at The Absent Willow Review. (No, I didn't link it, because I think most of you won't want to read the stories about werewolves and Mars that are in the current issue.) I'll link to the story once it's published, which will be on December 16. It doesn't pay anything unless I win the "Editor's Choice" contest for the month, in which case it'll win $50. However, it's not about the money at the moment, just getting my work out there. I'm very excited, despite the suddenly staid tone my writing seems to have assumed. Oh well. Champagne anyone? ;)
Cheers,
Breanna
Saturday, August 29, 2009
We're Alive...
Cheers!
Breanna
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
18 Quarts of Apple Butter Later...
Enjoy!
Cheers,
Breanna
Monday, August 24, 2009
It's Autumn (Because Autumn is a Prettier Word Than Fall)
Thursday, August 20, 2009
What We've Been Doing...
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
And So It Begins--

Monday, August 17, 2009
In Case You Need a Laugh Today...

Friday, August 14, 2009
Just Babies!
(Anyone? Anyone? I thought that might only be me.)
The babies have been severely cute lately.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Jephthah's Daughter
Anyway, I was reading today in Judges about Jephthah--you know, the guy who judged Israel and, while chasing the Ammonites, says "God, if You let me defeat the Ammonites, I'll sacrifice whatever comes out of my house to meet me when I get home as a burnt offering", and then it turns out to be his daughter--and a couple of things struck me.
One was that the enemies of Israel aren't terribly creative; when Jephthah asks the king of Ammon why Ammon is fighting a war with Israel, the Ammonite king says, "Because you stole my land." Jephthah points out that Israel never did conquer any land that could be considered Ammonite, and that anyway it's been 300 years since the conquest, so why hasn't Ammon done anything in all that time? To which the Ammonite king replies, more or less, "Well, I'm still going to kick your butt."
The second thing I noticed was the whole notorious vow-to-sacrifice-the-daughter thing. This is usually cited as included in Scripture to point out "Don't make rash vows" which, indeed, the Lord Himself reinforces in the New Testament when He tells us not to swear oaths at all, but something else about it hit me today: Jephthah was ignoring a path of action that God laid out, and taking his own path.
You see, this wasn't happening back in the pre-Mosaic era when folks could be understood for not knowing the kinds of sacrifices that God wanted. The Lord had spent forty years in the wilderness, and who knows how many more in the land, hammering into the heads of the Israelites exactly what kinds of sacrifices He wanted for exactly which occasions, what they were supposed to be comprised of, and when and where they were supposed to be offered. There was already a "Wow, I'm grateful, God" sacrifice, and a "I just feel like praising God" sacrifice. That Jephthah was circumventing all this might be understandable (like the guy from my home town who promised God that he'd build a giant statue of the Virgin Mary if his wife didn't die of cancer) but it was not right.
The thing is, all the sacrifices that God ordered were so exact because they were a physical picture of a spiritual reality, a foreshadowing of the ultimate Sacrifice on the Cross. God wasn't interested in sacrifice per se; it's not as though He needs to eat. He just knows us well enough to know that only a picture as vivid as a lamb or bull getting its throat cut and then being totally consumed on an altar will teach us the seriousness and costliness of sin.
When we ignore the provision of God and make up our own way of doing things, we're being just as foolish as Jephthah was. Death may not result from our foolishness--but it's not out of the question. There's a reason why the Book of Proverbs over and over again condemns a fool. A fool behaves in ways that are not consistent with reality, and sooner or later reality (occasionally in the shape of the law of gravity or a hungry bear) will fall on the fool's pointy head.
Perhaps the death we're talking about is the death of a relationship, because I ignore God's commands to speak lovingly and forgive my friend, with the excuse "I'm just a blunt person." Maybe it's the death of a freedom, because I ignore God's commands to pray for those in authority, excusing it because "We've tried that and nobody comes to those meetings." (Who said there had to be meetings?) And just maybe I ignore God's commands to bring my children up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, because it's easier to let them sass me, have their own way, and throw fits about having to go to church--and the death is really the premature death of a disobedient child that is the flip side of the promise in the fifth commandment.
The encouraging thing? God is the Lord of Life, not death, and He honors repentence. Just because we may have engaged in foolish Jephthah-type behavior before doesn't mean we have to keep doing it. We can confess it to the Lord, Who says He will forgive us, and we can stop doing those crazy, foolish things, and start doing the simple things He asks of us.
Granted, having your pastor lay his hands on you and ask God to heal you isn't as impressive as putting up a fifty-foot statue of the Virgin Mary, but it has the advantage of actually being obedient.
Now if Icould just stop fussing at the kids long enough for this to sink in...
Cheers,
Breanna
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
You All Knew It
At least, that's what the Today show tells me. Why else would I want more of these?
And this:
I usually turn some morning show on in order to catch the news brief so I know if anything exploded overnight and who got elected, that sort of thing. Their "lifestyle" pieces, having nothing whatever to do with my life, I generally ignore.
This morning, however, I happened to catch the teaser question "Why are couples choosing to have more kids?" I was mildly interested and left the TV on for the segment, expecting the answer to be, more or less, "because they can!" The answer they gave?
Because women are crazy.
They couched it in slightly nicer (only slightly) language, of course; they talked about how society values pregnancy and how women enjoy the "adulation" they get while they're pregnant. They talked about women being "bumpaholics" - addicted to pregnancy - and one (presumably childless and sane) psychologist compared women who want more children to the black-widow alien she-devil in the movie Species. (This is the alien who, upon finding out that the guy she chose to father her alien children was a diabetic, thrust a spike through his skull and walked on, unconcerned, to the next bar to find another guy.)
And the kicker? Guess how many children it takes for a woman to be nuts?
Two is apparently ok, but if you want three or four kids, your husband better just watch out that he doesn't develop diabetes.
The interviewer feebly tried to suggest that surely, this sort of mad pregnancy-desire psychosis was rare?
"I don't know how rare it is," replied the psychologist. "Women need to understand why they're getting pregnant before they get pregnant."
Gosh, maybe the reason a woman is getting pregnant is because she wants a baby?
I was more shocked and appalled than I should be, I suppose; it just struck me as odd to hear four children described as a "big" family. After all, I peresonally know families that have five, seven, and eight kids respectively; through the internet, I'm familiar with famlies that have ten or more children. To my mind, a family starts being big when you have to buy the nine-passenger van to get to church. Three or four kids are just...well, average.
But that wasn't what appalled me. I shouldn't be surprised, in a country that murders thousands of unborn babies every month, that we devalue children to the extent that people who happen to like a lot of them must necessarily be less sane than people who spend their money on, say, Van Goghs or Lexuses. (Lexi?) It is appalling, however, to see the distain for children so blatantly displayed on national television--to see that it doesn't expect to be rebuked or even noticed very much.
I'm not one to say that, in the Catholic phrase, a Christian has to be "open to life in all instances". I think limiting your family, with non-abortificant contraceptives, is perfectly acceptable Biblically. (That's another blog.) However, if a couple is convicted that they should never use contraceptives, God forbid that I should tell them they need to. God will choose to bless some folks and not others with lots of kids; some folks are called to have lots of kids and some aren't. But since I don't know everything and can't read anybody's mind, I can never say with certainty whether someone is having kids in response to a call from God, because they just like babies, or because they are a "bumpaholic". Frankly, I don't think it's any of my business.
However, when we as a society define "more than two kids" as "crazy", even if we're not actively imposing limits on the number of children a couple may have, like China, we're imposing significant social sanctions on people who have three or more children. Nobody wants to be treated as though they're crazy.
As for the supposed adulation of women who are pregnant, I never experienced that during my pregnancies. Pregnancy for me is a means, not an end; anyone who thinks that the occasional stranger saying "Boy, you must be ready to pop!" is attention enough to compensate for swollen feet, having to pee every half hour, and throwing up each morning has never been pregnant. The reason women put up with being pregnant is that we want a baby. What's so pathological about that?
The psychologist ended the interview by saying, "Of course, I would never tell anyone what the right number of children is for a family to have. Whether to have another baby should be a family decision."
Well, madam, it always HAS BEEN. And since I'm crazy (I want two more kids, eventually), maybe you ought to refrain from telling me what to do.
Vive la crazies,
Breanna
Friday, August 7, 2009
Tralalalalala
Miss Boo and I found this song:
Does it sound to anyone else like Manneheim Steamroller is doing the accompaniment?
Finally, we are hoping, the Clappy People (the Slovenian a capella group I posted about a while ago) have lost their bedtime/naptime ascendancy. This is a good thing, because Mama was getting ready to urge the State Department to declare war on Slovenia. Lately Miss Boo has been asking for "fwogs" - Kermit and his buddies. I'll take anything not Slovenian.
Baby Pics tomorrow if things go according to plan.
Cheers,
Breanna
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
The Vocation of Motherhood
Oof.
Sort of puts things in perspective, don't it?
This quote struck me last night, and a blog I've been looking at lately, Conversion Diary, had another quote today:
Duty before holiness.
This sounds like an oxymoron at first, but it might be more clear if we said Duty before "holiness". In other words, God has clearly called you to something, and that something usually has its boring days or its days when everybody is whining and pooping at once and the hamburger isn't defrosted. (Clearly, I'm called to motherhood.) It can be tempting to neglect the duty God has placed before us--like washing dishes or doing the laundry--for something "holier" like spiritual reading, church work, or...ahem, writing blog posts.
I think this is because, quite simply, we like to define holiness. Doing what God has asked you to do is always more holy and important than doing something that fits our own definition of holiness. If we get to define holiness, we'll always achieve it; and Isaiah says that all our goodness is like filthy rags. If we do something "holy" instead of the actual task God has placed before us, no matter how routine or small, then we are not being holy, we are being disobedient.
Sort of puts a whole new spin on doing laundry and dishes, and helps me understand how everything can be done for the glory of God. Not that I argue with that Scripture, because after all it is Scripture, but sometimes it's hard to see how, practically, I can wash up the counter for the glory of God. If, in actual fact, He has asked me to wash up the counter, than washing up the counter as if He was watching me is doing it to the glory of God. And, incidentally, He is watching me.
I think this might also be something like the "practice of the presence of God" that Brother Andrew talks about.
Anyhow, worth thinking about today as you deal with your own versions of laundry, dishes, and poopy diapers.
Cheers,
Breanna
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Back on the Wagon
So you'll remember that a while ago I asked you all to yell at me if I fell off my "Stop Looking Four Months Pregnant" diet/exercise plan. You couldn't, because I cleverly didn't tell you that I basically stopped exercising (except for a lot of extra housework) for like three weeks, between company and general "I'm-having-a-busy-day-so-I-think-laundry-counts-as-exercise" days. I ALSO felt the need to partake of goodies I made for said company. I'd have gained a bunch of weight if it wasn't for this guy
Anyhow, after contemplating the pan of cinnamon rolls I made on Sunday, of which Miss Boo and I consumed at least half (and look at her, she's not that big, how much could she have possibly eaten?)
I also told myself that I could have as much as I wanted of anything healthy, but of unhealthy stuff I could have One. So in other words, One cinnamon roll, One cup of coffee with half & half, One...fill in the blank. Amazing how much more you savor something when you only get one! I let myself have as much black coffee as I wanted however.
I like that the book suggests you first decide where in your schedule you're going to have time for daily prayer, even if it's only five minutes. And I like that it takes more into account when planning the use of time than just whether you get the laundry washed and put away on the same day.
So maybe, with the help of this book, I'll be able to exercise every day this week, like I want to. We'll see, and I'll try to keep you informed.
Cheers,
Breanna
P.S.
Happy Birthday, Baba!